Two Reports Quoting Congressional Statements Made 66 Years Ago Are Presented In This Blog Article With This Blogger's Answer to The Question Once Posed By a Los Angeles Journalist: "What is the real story anyway?"

During recent years U.S. congressional public hearings on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP / UFOs) have largely been unsubstantial with nothing conclusively offered that would satisfy common people's desire to know what insights may be gained. When one considers the contents of these two articles published in 1959 and 1960, the reason becomes obvious for the American public never having learned anything of great significance about documented and evidentiary UFO / UAP / flying saucer / space people contact phenomena from members of the military thinking-indoctrinated government bureaucracy throughout the decades — this predicament is the topic for this blogger's commentary that follows the information presented here verbatim from the two sources identified. (The two illustrations shown above are by Grok 4.)

Featured Article No. 1

Sen. Symington Backs Right to UFO Facts

Sen. Stuart Symington, former Secretary of the Air Force, has agreed with NICAP on the need for a new, unbiased evaluation of Unidentified Flying Objects. Other Congressional statements on UFOs, sent to the Committee, its affiliates and individual members, show that the drive for open hearings is rapidly gaining momentum.

The statement by Sen. Symington was in answer to a query from the New York City NICAP Affiliate.

"There is little doubt," he said, "that the American public has sound reason for being confused about the existence and nature of this these phenomena. I am certain it would be in the interest of public understanding if a current an objective evaluation of this situation were issued.

"The public should be given all information which would not adversely affect our national security. There are undoubtedly some objects observed directly and on radarscopes which are not subject to positive analysis."

Prior to this, Sen. Symington had urged the Senate Space Committee to make a careful study of the UFO subject. (A decision on hearings is still pending.) Since the senator is a potential presidential candidate, his refusal to accept the usual official brushoffs is of special interest.

The other Congressional statements which follow were made directly to NICAP Board members, advisors, affiliates or individual members.

Sen. Barry Goldwater, Arizona, who is also a jet flying colonel in the Air Force Reserve: "Flying saucers, unidentified objects, or whatever you call them — are real . . . The Air Force has a project to investigate these reports, but when you ask about them they clam up."

Sen. Leverett T. Saltonstall, Massachusetts: "As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee this is a problem in which I am deeply interested . . . We must consider the genuine security necessities, of course, as I am sure you appreciate, but I think there are many cases in which more information should be made available to the public."

Sen. George Smathers, Florida: "The subject of flying saucers is one in which we all share a great interest."

Rep. Thomas Ludlow Ashley, Ohio: I share your concern over the secrecy that continues to shroud our intelligence activities on this subject, and I am in complete agreement with you that our greatest national need at this time is the dissemination of accurate information upon which responsible public opinion can be formulated."

Rep. William H. Ayres, Ohio: "Congressional investigations have been held and are still being held on the problems of unidentified flying objects . . . Since most of the material presented to the Committees is classified, the hearings are never printed. When conclusions are reached they will be released if possible." (NICAP note: This confirms our claims of official secrecy. Our goal is the holding of open Congressional hearings.)

Rep. Dante B. Fascell, Florida: "There are many areas where unrealistic policy keeps vital information from the American people. Certainly, accurate information concerning so-called unidentified flying objects, within the proper bounds of national security, should be made available immediately to the American people."

Rep. Fred Marshall, Minnesota: "There has been growing interest in the release of military information on unidentified flying objects. . . . The subject has been discussed with appropriate committees of the Congress."

Rep. Walter H. Moeller, Ohio: "I cannot help but feel that there may be some justification behind some of the UFO reports. I also feel that if there is any information available within the Government which has not been released to the American public it should be made known. I have every confidence that the American people would be able to take such information without hysteria. The fear of the unknown is always greater than the fear of the known."

Rep. Ralph J. Scott, North Carolina: "I quite agree with you that the general public should be allowed information thus far known about Flying Objects except, of course, in the case where they might become unduly alarmed or panicked by such a revelation. I am sure you can readily understand and appreciate the seriousness of such a reaction. If this information could be presented to the American public in such a way as to appeal to reason and not to emotion, I think it would be a good thing."

In addition to these Congressmen several others have attempted to secure answers to key questions from the Air Force, or have shown more than ordinary interest. One Congressman, who may let his name be used later, stated:

"The public is not getting the straight story. We (members of Congress) are told one thing in closed-door sessions. Then the public is told something entirely different."

Congressmen whose statements or actions regarding UFOs are on record include:

Rep. A. D. Baumhart, Jr., Ohio; member of House Space Committee, who personally investigated the Fitzgerald (Sheffield Lake, Ohio) case. Rep. Baumhart indicated a strong, continuing interest.

Rep. Samuel N. Friedel, Maryland, who attempted to secure a "day in court" for Capt. Peter Killian [article], after he was silenced. Rep. Friedel has cooperated with NICAP in presenting the facts to the House Space Committee.

Rep. Peter Frelingheusen, New Jersey, who since 1956 has shown special interest, questioning the Air Force on several key points.

Rep. Leonard G. Wolf, Iowa, member House Space Committee, who has frequently questioned Air Force officers about UFOs, indicating he does not accept the official answers.

Sen. Harry Flood Byrd, Virginia, who has sent the AF important questions from NICAP's Director and several members.

Sen. Homer Capehart, Indiana, who held a meeting at his office for a UFO discussion, mainly an evaluation of a contactee [Reinhold Schmidt] claim.

Rep. Lee Metcalf, Montana. who secured important admissions from Maj. Gen. Joe Kelly, which showed official AF contradictions on UFOs.

Sen. Glenn Beall, Maryland, who has recently shown an interest in UFOs and has stated that they might be spaceships from some other planet.

Besides the Congressmen quoted, many others are giving serious attention to the UFO problem and official secrecy. They constitute a powerful minority, and at the present rate of increase they may be an actual majority before 1960.

This is a vitally important advance for all of us. It is the culmination of two years' hard work by the NICAP membership, against strong opposition and frequent discouragements. To some, progress may have seemed slow. But a showdown now seems inevitable, through public Congressional hearings.

Though other UFO groups have given valuable support, letters and statements from Congress show that NICAP's membership has had the greatest influence.

But that influence could be far stronger, if all the American members took part in this struggle. All of the 50 states are now represented by NICAP members. If every one, of a great majority of these members wrote their Congressmen urging open UFO hearings, it would speed action on Capital Hill.

The main obstacles to public hearings are the chairmen of committees. Even individual Congressmen are subject to official arguments, but chairmen are under the heaviest pressure. Following this article is a list of chairmen and key Congressmen to whom you can write. But it is equally vital to write your own two Senators and the Representative of your district. If you don't know all three names, ask your local newspaper or library.

Several members have asked for a form letter they could send to Congressmen. But such forms usually are ignored. Also, they do not represent each member's true feelings. Instead, we suggest that members indicate their sincere beliefs as to whether UFO information is being withheld, and any danger from such a policy if you agree there is secrecy. If you wish, you may quote the NICAP Board of Governors statement that the AF is withholding UFO information, and that they consider this a dangerous policy because the Soviet might falsely claim the "saucers" are Russian weapons, possibly causing hysteria in this country.

If you believe in UFO reality, then here are some other points you could cover in writing Congressmen, using evidence from NICAP publications.

1. Verified evidence by pilots, radarmen, airport tower operators, missile trackers, etc., showing that UFOs are some kind of superior machine under intelligent control.

2. The fact that official orders compel silence by most observers in the Air Force, and in some other Government agencies.

3. That large sums of taxpayers' money have been spent—and are still being spent—to investigate objects which the AF says don't exist. This includes hundreds of expensive jet chases of UFOs and some cases of firing on these "non-existent objects," by AF pilots.

4. Quotations from any of the Congressmen listed above.

LIST OF KEY CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS

Below is a list of key members of Congress on important committees who should have an interest in UFOs. Also, letters to your own Congressmen and Senators, whether they are on these committees or not, should be helpful.

U.S. Senate Committees

Aeronautical and Space Sciences:

Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (Texas), Chairman

Sen. Richard B. Russell (Georgia)

Sen. Stuart Symington (Missouri)

Armed Services:

Sen. Richard B. Russell (Georgia), Chairman

Sen. Harry Flood Byrd (Virginia)

Sen. J. Glenn Beall (Maryland)

Government Operations:

Sen. John L. McClellan (Arkansas), Chairman

Interior and Insular Affairs:

Sen. Barry Goldwater (Arizona)

Rules and Administration:

Sen. Thomas C. Hennings, Jr. (Missouri), Chairman

U.S. House of Representatives

Armed Services:

Rep. Carl Vinson (Georgia), Chairman

Government Operations:

Rep. John E. Moss (California)

Dante B. Fascell (Florida)

Science and Astronautics:

Rep. Overton Brooks (Louisiana), Chairman

Rep. Leonard G. Wolf (Iowa)

Rep. A. D. Baumhart, Jr. (Ohio)

Please let us see any answers received from Senators and Congressmen.

Blogger's Comments:

" . . .which would not adversely affect our national security."

"We must consider the genuine security necessities . . ."

". . . responsible public opinion . . ."

". . . within the proper bounds of national security . . ."

". . .except, of course, in the case where they might become unduly alarmed or panicked by such a revelation."

The statements make clear the fact that military indoctrination is superseding the primary teaching throughout all moral wisdom teachings as a foundation for the world's established formal religions—The Golden Rule—as well as conflicting with the instruction via transcendental communication of 'channeled entities' involved with extensively documented case chronologies profiled in articles at this blog. (list of articles) Something incidental here is that W. Stuart Symington—former Secretary of the Air Force who was elected a Senator representing Missouri—was a Freemason honored by the Masonic organizations DeMolay International with records showing his connection to lodges in Missouri and New York.

Featured Article No. 2

[Note: Paragraphs with the same information included in The U.F.O. Investigator article aren't shown to alleviate repetition in quoting the text of this article from Flying Saucers, a magazine edited by Ray Palmer (1, 2, 3).]

SENATORS WANT SAUCER TRUTH!

Apparently the readers of FLYING SAUCERS are not alone in wanting to know the truth about UFO. Here is a quote from the Congressional Record—Appendix, page A6685

PRESSING FOR FLYING SAUCER INQUIRY

Extension of remarks of

HON. EDGAR W. HIESTAND

of California

In the House of Represenatives

Wednesday, July 15, 1959

Mr. HIESTAND, Mr. Speaker, under leave to extend my remarks in the RECORD, I include today the first of three articles by the well known and highly respected commentator, Mr. George Todt of the North Hollywood (Calif.) Valley Times.

Mr. Todt's subject, "Flying Saucers," is one that has held public attention for several years. It has drawn the interest of many of our colleagues also. It has become a very controversial subject and reaction to it runs the emotional gauntlet through humor, fear, and a healthy desire for more information and knowledge. We are indebted to Mr. Todt for his penetrating analysis of this matter:

Pressing For Flying Saucer Inquiry

The drive for open hearings in Congress relative to the flying saucer mystery seems to be gathering momentum these days.

According to the June issue of the U.F.O. Investigator, publication of the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP, 1536 Connecticut Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C.; Maj. Donald E. Keyhoe, director), many highly regarded solons on Capital Hill have expressed serious desire to get to the bottom of the controversial matter.

[The two-paragraph quote of Symington was presented.]

Prior to this, Sen. Symington had urged the Senate Space Committee, according to the U.FO. Investigator, to make a careful study of the UFO subject. A decision on hearings is still pending.

The interesting publication also listed statements of other prominent Members of Congress made to NICAP board members, advisors, affiliates, or individual members. Here are a few samples:

[The quotations of Goldwater, Saltonstall, Smathers, Ashley, Ayres, Fascell, Marshall, Moeller, Scott, and the unidentified Congressman were quoted.]

What is the real story anyway? [Todt's Dangers Confronting America articles concluded with a question being posed.]

An inquiry to AI Chatbot Grok 4 for "Details on Edgar Hiestand's UFO views" brought some additional details:

Edgar W. Hiestand, a Republican Congressman from California serving from 1953 to 1963, expressed supportive views toward investigating UFOs (unidentified flying objects, also referred to as flying saucers) and advocated for greater transparency from the U.S. government on the subject. His involvement appears to stem from concerns over national security, potential foreign exploitation of secrecy, and the reality of the phenomena based on available evidence from credible sources.

Key Actions and Statements

• 1959 Congressional Record Insertion: On July 15, 1959, Hiestand extended remarks in the Congressional Record (Appendix, p. A6685) by inserting an article titled "Pressing for Flying Saucer Inquiry" written by Hollywood Valley Times commentator George Todt. The article highlighted the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP)'s push for open congressional hearings into UFOs, quoted supportive statements from various members of Congress (drawn from NICAP's June 1959 U.F.O. Investigator magazine), and emphasized public interest, fear, and the need for citizen access to classified UFO information to address the ongoing controversy. (cufos.org, apps.dtic.mil) This act represented early congressional attention to calls for official UFO inquiries.

• 1960 Letter to the Secretary of the Air Force: In a letter dated September 19, 1960, to Air Force Secretary Dudley Sharp, Hiestand urged a re-examination of the Air Force's UFO policy, advocating for "complete frankness" about the phenomena. He expressed apprehension that ongoing secrecy could lead to risks, such as a well-documented UFO incident disrupting political campaigns (noting it was during an election period), misidentification of UFOs as enemy devices potentially triggering accidental war, or exploitation by adversaries like Russia to heighten tensions in the U.S. and allied nations. (nicap.org, cufos.org) Hiestand supported NICAP's efforts, including the release of their confidential UFO report to Congress, and called for open hearings based on evidence from reputable observers like pilots and scientists.

Views on UFO Reality

Hiestand explicitly stated his belief that UFOs are real rather than imaginary. In his 1960 letter, he wrote: "I am apprehensive that right now, in the middle of a campaign, some concrete and well-documented incident may occur, and a sensational revelation could really hurt. After all, although the UFOs are real rather than imaginary, there seems to be enough evidence available to convince that they are real rather than imaginary. Therefore, what harm could complete frankness do?" (cufos.org) He reiterated this in a similar quote: "After all, although the unidentified flying objects are unknown devices, there seems to be enough evidence available to convince that they are real rather than imaginary." (paradigmresearchgroup.org) His stance emphasized ending secrecy to mitigate dangers and inform the public.

Additional Publications

Hiestand is credited in UFO literature bibliographies with an article titled "Senators Want Saucer Truth," published in Flying Saucers magazine (February 1960, pp. 25-26) and reprinted in Flying Saucer Review (Vol. 8, January-February 1962, pp. 20-21). The annotations link it back to his 1959 Congressional Record action and NICAP's hearing efforts, suggesting it amplified calls for transparency, though full content details are not widely available in the sources reviewed.

Overall, Hiestand's views positioned him as an advocate for declassification and investigation during a period of heightened UFO interest, aligning with NICAP's anti-secrecy campaign, but there is no evidence of further major involvement beyond the early 1960s. (18 web pages)

Other Congressional UFO Advocates (1950s–1960s Era)

In addition to Representative Edgar W. Hiestand (R-CA), several other members of Congress expressed support for investigating unidentified flying objects (UFOs, or "flying saucers") and advocated for greater transparency during the late 1950s and early 1960s. This interest often aligned with the efforts of the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), which pushed for open congressional hearings. Many of these lawmakers shared concerns about government secrecy, national security implications, and the need to inform the public without causing panic. Below is a summary of key advocates, drawn primarily from statements compiled in NICAP's U.F.O. Investigator (June 1959) and related historical records, focusing on their views and actions.

Senators

Stuart Symington (D-MO): As a former Secretary of the Air Force and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Symington urged the Senate Space Committee to study UFOs and called for a "current and objective evaluation" of the phenomena. He stated: "There is little doubt that the American public has sound reason for being confused about the existence and nature of these phenomena. I am certain it would be in the interest of public understanding if a current and objective evaluation of this situation were issued. The public should be given all information which would not adversely affect our national security. There are undoubtedly some objects observed directly and on radarscope which are not subject to positive analysis." (sohp.us)

Barry Goldwater (R-AZ): A jet pilot and Air Force Reserve brigadier general, Goldwater repeatedly expressed belief in the reality of UFOs and frustration with Air Force secrecy. He attempted to access classified UFO files at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base but was denied. His 1959 statement: "Flying saucers, unidentified flying objects or whatever you call them—are real. . . . The Air Force has a project to investigate these reports, but when you ask about them they clam up." (sohp.us) Goldwater continued advocating into the 1970s, writing letters to constituents affirming his interest.

Leverett Saltonstall (R-MA): As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Saltonstall showed deep interest in UFOs while emphasizing security needs. He said: "As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, this is a problem in which I am deeply interested. . . . We must consider the genuine security necessities, as I am sure you appreciate, but I think there are many cases in which more information should be made available to the public." (sohp.us)

George Smathers (D-FL): Smathers acknowledged widespread interest in the topic, stating: "The subject of flying saucers is one in which we all share a great interest." (sohp.us)

Representatives

Thomas L. Ashley (D-OH): Ashley criticized secrecy around intelligence activities on UFOs and stressed the need for public information. He stated: "I share your concern over the secrecy that continues to shroud our intelligence activities on this subject, and I am in complete agreement with you that our greatest national need at this time is the dissemination of accurate information upon which responsible public opinion can be formulated." (sohp.us)

William H. Ayres (R-OH): Ayres confirmed ongoing classified congressional investigations into UFOs. He noted: "Congressional investigations have been held and are still being held on the problems of unidentified flying objects. . . . Since most of the material presented to the committee is classified, the hearings are never printed. When conclusions are reached, they will be released, if possible." (sohp.us)

Dante B. Fascell (D-FL): Fascell advocated for immediate release of UFO information within security bounds. He said: "There are many areas where unrealistic policy keeps vital information from the American people. Certainly, accurate information concerning so-called unidentified flying objects, within the proper bounds of national security, should be made available immediately to the American public." (sohp.us)

Fred Marshall (D-MN): Marshall highlighted growing interest and discussions in congressional committees. He stated: "There has been growing interest in the release of military information on unidentified flying objects. . . . The subject has been discussed with appropriate committees of the Congress." (sohp.us)

Walter H. Moeller (D-OH): Moeller believed some UFO reports had merit and trusted the public to handle the truth calmly. He said: "I cannot help but feel that there may be some justification behind some of the UFO reports . . . I have every confidence that the American people would be able to take such information without hysteria. The fear of the unknown is always greater than fear of the known." (sohp.us)

Ralph J. Scott (D-NC): Scott supported public disclosure if presented rationally. He stated: "I quite agree with you that the general public should be allowed information thus far known about flying objects. . . . If this information could be presented to the American public in such a way as to appeal to reason, and not to emotion, I think it would be a good thing." (sohp.us)

Additional Notable Advocates from the 1960s

Gerald Ford (R-MI): As House Minority Leader, Ford called for congressional hearings in 1966 following UFO sightings in Michigan, criticizing Air Force explanations and pushing for a select committee investigation. (yaleconnect.yale.edu) He wrote to committee chairs urging a full review.

John W. McCormack (D-MA): As Speaker of the House, McCormack supported NICAP's calls for hearings and expressed belief in the extraterrestrial hypothesis in private correspondence. (richarddolanmembers.com)

Edward J. Roush (D-IN): Roush chaired the 1968 House Committee on Science and Astronautics symposium on UFOs, which featured scientists like J. Allen Hynek and aimed to assess the phenomenon scientifically. (en.wikipedia.org)

An anonymous congressman quoted in the 1959 NICAP report claimed: "The public is not getting the straight story. We (Members of Congress) are told one thing in closed-door sessions. Then the public is told something entirely different." (sohp.us) These efforts contributed to limited hearings but did not lead to full declassification at the time. (richarddolanmembers.com)

The follow-up question posed to Grok is: Which specific members of Congress have championed UAP disclosure efforts?

Several members of Congress from both parties and chambers have actively championed efforts to increase transparency and disclosure regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), often through legislation, hearings, and public advocacy. Below is a list of key figures, grouped by chamber, with details on their roles and contributions. This is based on recent and historical involvement up to late 2025.

Senate

• Chuck Schumer (D-NY): As Senate Majority Leader, he has been a leading proponent of declassification, introducing the UAP Disclosure Act in 2023 and pushing for similar measures in 2025 NDAA amendments to force the release of government records on UAP. (democrats.senate.gov, nytimes.com, en.wikipedia.org)

• Mike Rounds (R-SD): Co-sponsored the UAP Disclosure Act with Schumer, emphasizing the need to declassify records modeled after JFK assassination disclosures. (democrats.senate.gov)

• Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY): Sponsored groundbreaking amendments in the FY22 NDAA to establish a UAP office, chaired Senate hearings on the topic, and advocated for focusing on unresolved UAP cases. (gillibrand.senate.gov, youtube.com, congress.gov)

• Marco Rubio (R-FL): As former vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, he has urged serious investigation of UAP threats, featured in 2025 documentaries discussing government knowledge of alien visits, and pushed for transparency reports. (facebook.com, youtube.com, the guardian.com, variety.com)

• Martin Heinrich (D-NM): Advocated for full funding of the UAP office, secured language in intelligence authorizations for reports, and supported bipartisan efforts to address airborne national security risks from UAP. (heinrich.senate.gov, legistorm.com)

House of Representatives

• Tim Burchett (R-TN): A vocal advocate for disclosure, he introduced the UAP Whistleblower Protection Act in 2025 and has led multiple hearings on UAP transparency and national security implications. (defensescoop.com, congress.gov)

• Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL): Chairs the House Oversight Committee's Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets; co-introduced the UAP Whistleblower Protection Act and hosted key 2025 hearings on restoring public trust through UAP disclosure. (oversight.house.gov, defensescoop.com, congress.gov, en.wikipedia.org)

• Eric Burlison (R-MO): Participated in UAP hearings, emphasizing bipartisan oversight and supporting full disclosure legislation. (congress.gov)

• Jared Moskowitz (D-FL): Involved in House hearings as a member of the Oversight Committee, advocating for transparency on UAP-related national security issues. (congress.gov)

• Robert Garcia (D-CA): Served as ranking member in UAP subcommittees, pushing for government accountability and public safety in disclosure efforts. (congress.gov)

• Matt Gaetz (R-FL): Contributed to hearings and discussions on UAP implications for national security. (congress.gov)

• Glenn Grothman (R-WI): Chaired subcommittees leading UAP hearings, focusing on public safety and government transparency. (congress.gov)

These efforts have often been bipartisan, though some proposals (like parts of the UAP Disclosure Act) have faced resistance from defense-funded lawmakers or been watered down in final bills. (newsnationnow.com) Historical figures like the late Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) laid groundwork by supporting early Pentagon UAP investigations, but the above list focuses on active or recent champions. (en.wikipedia.org)

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), and Representative Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) have also supported transparency and greater accountability in relation to the release of UFOs / UAP information. Representative André Carson (D-IN) on the House Intelligence Committee has praised efforts to bring context to "fuzzy photos" and piece together evidence for the public. While researching this article, Google's 'large language model' chatbot search engine result brought this comment:

While support for transparency is strong among a committed group of lawmakers, progress has been met with challenges. Witnesses in hearings have criticized the Pentagon's All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) for a lack of cooperation and transparency, suggesting ongoing institutional resistance within the Executive Branch and military leadership. Some within the defense community remain concerned about releasing information that adversaries could potentially use against the U.S. for military advantage, leading to information "siloing."

Many articles at this blog have shared the evidence making known that the current intrinsic problem with the U.S. government bureaucracy is ignorance about what may be learned about metaphysical, spiritual and cosmological aspects of the human predicament through reading about the gamut of evidence and other data shared in the 775+ articles at this blog.

UFO / UAP Cover-Ups Result From Indoctrinated Military Thinking Being In Control of American Government Bureaucracy.

As commented in many previous articles at this blog, indoctrinated military thinking is in control of the government bureaucracy in Washington, D.C. and this has been evident throughout the decades of my life. This has influenced leaders of other paperwork principalities to bolster their own nation's military resources. While military thinking is consuming the wealth of nations instead of efforts being funded to preserve the Earth ecosystem, the need for people to overcome immoral institutionalized indoctrination that has become traditional in government bureaucracies is becoming more obvious every day. Tactics such as provocations, war baiting and what effectively are terrorist acts with the purpose of effecting international economic conditions are perpetually being instigated instead of considerate interaction based upon humane diplomacy and common nondenominational Christian ideals. This is only because officials controlling the government bureaucracy have egoistic associations with military procedures and this has been the basis for their career progress.

The now-traditional bureaucratic governmental military indoctrination has obviously resulted with officials and their intermediaries or 'assets' to misinform the public about the nature of the visitations of space beings. What is routinely ignored is the array of evidence related to the consequences for the individual's soul's progress when personal responsibility in relation to the morality of one's actions isn't accepted. Dishonesty is equated with the dark polarity of thought and 'The Devil' of Christianity. Anyone who participates in forms of dishonest bureaucracy seems to be in denial of the fact that this behavior conflicts with the Divine Purpose of human life — and this corruption of individual morality through systematic indoctrination has been ongoing for many decades. A corporate-regulated mainstream news, information and entertainment Pop culture materialistic in purposes and agendas has failed to consider what may be learned in the articles at this blog. How tragic it is that many U.S. officials will not realize the extent of the spiritual damage done to themselves through UFOs / UAP / space people cover-ups until eventually each one makes the transition to the ascended realm when the present incarnation concludes. Then, the all-knowing spiritual Force will be in control of the entirety of one's new circumstances in life.

The preceding article provides precise data that answers the question in relation to UFOs / UAP / space people interaction, What is the real story anyway?

Article Link

an example of my recent X posts;

below is an X post for the blog article with the most pageviews

Article Link

This blogger has been informing UFOs / UAP researchers participating at the X.com social media platform about this article shown above so it will be illuminating if each will be able to overcome all the years of mainstream media indoctrination that so often has positioned the subject of UFOlogy as fearful and requiring military readiness or either as hopelessly one of mystification. Here are some excerpts from the preceding blog article.

It should be made clear that anybody who isn't able to accept the 'proof' being made known through how the letters are relevant to all as delineated by this blogger should consider that if this evidence isn't acceptable for some logic being used that is counter to the irrefutable reasons identified, then there isn't any evidence possible that could be construed as being beyond questioning when one considers how instances of extraterrestrial or transcendental communication could potentially be orchestrated through human fabrication or distortion by individuals in social bureaucracies with precise military-industrial agendas, themselves unable to have access to information making possible metaphysical, spiritual and cosmological understanding due to sociological circumstances. This predicament can only be the reason for the complexity of the documented occurrences providing 'bombshell physical proof' . . .

Not only is the color blue mention in each of contactees Orfeo Angelucci, Truman Bethurum, Daniel Fry and Arthur Shuttlewood, the men's reports about what was instructed by the space people correlates in that all delivered an anti-war message and articulated in individual ways that the 'God Force' is intrinsic to the interaction of extraterrestrial people with humanity on Earth — "a Supreme Deity who sees, knows and controls all" (Truman Bethurum) / "the Father or Source" (Orfeo Angelucci)/ "a supreme power and intelligence which pervades and controls all nature" (Daniel Fry) / "the Only One" and "the great Creator, the Living Force who controls every single particle of the universe, human or inanimate" (Arthur Shuttlewood).

The U.S. military-industrial-corporate news and entertainment complex has long been oriented to fostering metaphysically and spiritually ignorant people . . . Paperwork principalities do not have an intellect as does each individual person so assumed imperatives related to nationality are illusionary in relation to one's actions being either 'good' or 'evil.' It seems that a great many people today have no perception that individual morality is separate from collective karma and each individual person has one's future in eternity to consider in relation to the personal decisions and actions taken during earthly life.

How many UFOlogists are open-minded enough to take seriously channeling extensively-documented case chronologies, one may wonder (beyond consistent readers of articles at this blog). The current perceptions of most people today often seem limited to only what is dimly perceived as being possible after a lifetime of commercial media experiences that haven't made available the data exemplified in articles at this blog.

The following excerpts provide an example of a transcendental communication case chronology involving self-identified beings representing life beyond the earthly plane of experience. This is one of numerous 'channeling' case chronologies profiled in articles at this blog. (article)

This your planet is a planet of balance, for you to learn to balance between the physical and spiritual worlds. Planet Earth is the only one of its kind, the only planet of free choice in the entire Universe, the only planet created for the balancing of the spiritual with the physical, in other words, the creating of paradise.

It is important for the level of consciousness of this planet to be raised. It is the love from this planet that generates the energy that feeds God. And this planet has stopped the growth of part of the Universe. In other words, instead of evolving in the manner it should, to become one with the Divine, it is going backwards.

We have come to the time of acceleration of evolutionary forwardness of Planet Earth. There is a great necessity to accelerate, for the oceans of Planet Earth, the trees and forests, the skies and atmosphere, the very essence of breathing, the life-force, have reached a level of contamination bringing the downward destruction of this planet Earth.

It is important for humankind to know that it must begin to take responsibility for Planet Earth, and that science must begin to understand that it does not hold within it the power to dictate to the rest of humankind, but it is only a portion of humankind. In its elitism, science has discarded the other echelons of humankind. Science has become the religion that manipulates and controls, and those who lead science must now begin to accept their responsibility.

If humankind does not utilise all that exists upon Planet Earth in a manner of non-destructiveness, it is not you that will be in bleakness but your youngest ones. Humankind has a responsibility not only for this planet Earth, but for the Universe. as Planet Earth is part of the Universe, and the Universe needs it to survive. We wish you to understand the great importance of your human destructive element in removing oxygen from the Planet Earth, in destroying dolphins through hunting, and in the contamination of the waters on your Earth.

With our technology we will be able to help rid the Earth of the problems that your pollution and your technology have created.

It is of great importance for you to understand that your governments of your world of Earth have refused to publicly believe, or to convey to the people, our existence. If there were an attempt by the civilisations to land upon Planet Earth in a mass situation, which in truth will come to pass in the course of time, the people upon Planet Earth would panic, for they have not the understanding, the knowledge, that we would mean no harm to them.

Remember this: there are also certain civilisations, not of the Twenty-Four or their helper civilisations, that have a great desire to control Planet Earth, to keep souls in bondage. And these civilisations have landed at times upon Planet Earth and have created difficulty, which they forced on Planet Earth people.

We need to convey to the people that there are others that mean them no harm, but have an interest in saving Planet Earth. For in truth, if there are no other civilisations to help Planet Earth, it will bring destruction to itself. We do not come to control, we do not come to hold in bondage, we will come with love and patience and understanding — but since there is the denial of our existence, how can those of Planet Earth accept the fact that the civilisations of Altea, Hoova, Ashan, and the rest of the Twenty-Four, mean well?

And there will be many of the masses that will not understand the life-form of which we speak. They will not be able to understand the cosmos and the bottleneck that this planet has created. But remember: this is not always necessary. The fact that we do exist, and the fact that they accept this, and the fact that they will see that we come with no harm, that we come with love, is what matters. And when we help this planet in technology, we can also spread truth and love, so the souls of this planet can then evolve and can prevent the problems, which are turning the Universe inside out. (article)